(via nefariousnewt)
Letter to future self: If you become a doctor, never ever go on a doctor’s strike. Frankly, it’s unethical, unless your lack of involvement actually poses a greater danger to patients. Don’t trick yourself into believing that the greedy choice for you is actually the best option for patients as well.
Anonymous asked: Why do you never update your blog anymore?
University started -_-“
But I shall try.
Anonymous asked: Hey by the way...how did it feel when Portugal humiliated Spain in their last match? Spain's not so great when the linesmen aren't too blind to see when David Villa is offside.
The Nov friendly right? Agreed. So much sadness. Pique’s header save in front of the net was probably the best thing from Spain’s side all game :(
It didn’t help that Iker was a little off his game. Portugal played well, no doubt. Maybe the large number of Barca players expect to be just as good with the Spanish NT even when they lose some of their best players…
</3
Anonymous asked: If one believes in the many world interpretation of quantum mechanics, is there no such thing as lying anymore since all answers are equally possible?
Also
What is hate?
1) As someone who functions primarily with a phenomenological perspective, I want to say that’s silly. IMO, lying and truth are different from false and correct. I believe that lying has more to do with what you believe is false and correct. So if in fact you believe that there is a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow and you tell someone that there isn’t - you’re lying (regardless of whether there is a pot of gold or not).
The existence of that pot of gold is about being false and correct. I’m currently reading up on some of Hume’s work and apparently even this isn’t as simple as it seems. But of course, in your question, we were working under the assumption that the existence of all answers (and thus the existence of the pot of gold) are equally true.
Aside: I think you meant “equally true” because “equally possible” implies statistical probability for predicting something in the future. If in fact, these worlds co-exist then they are happening at the same time, making them “equally true”. But that’s just semantics.
2) Hate. Not the opposite of love. For some reason, I can only define emotions as negations of other emotions. The variability in how we experience hate is so subjective from person to person and even within a person at different time points, that there is no definition.
It is often something I personally associate with anger but I can imagine some people may not always feel the two together. Perhaps it’s the feelings of *wishing out of existence* (Disliking something so much that you wish it didn’t exist). I definitely put dislike and hate on the same gradient of emotion. I’m not sure if that’s the same for everyone.
3) Lastly, why ask me these questions? Who are you anon and what are you looking for, if anything?
